<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scott D. Mainwaring</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cranor, Lorrie Faith</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Garfinkel, Simson</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Privacy Issues and Human-Computer Interaction</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Security and usability: designing secure systems that people can use</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">privacy</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2005</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">O&#039;Reilly Media</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge, MA</style></pub-location><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">19--26</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;This chapter will largely view HCI in its broader context. HCI is not just about user interfaces but also about the user experience&amp;nbsp; of systems: how people perceive and understand, reason and learn about, and react and adapt to digital technologies. To borrow the terminology Sasse and Flechais2&amp;nbsp; use in discussing security, HCI has come to deal not only with process&amp;nbsp; (how systems are used, designed, and developed) and product &amp;nbsp;(the systems themselves and their interfaces), but also panorama&amp;nbsp; (cultural and organizational contexts that support, discourage, or otherwise shape the systems they envelope). Privacy, like security, implicates all of these levels. It is by its nature both a question of the user and his or her data but also the user and others’ use of that data. Our interests, therefore, will be those of HCI-writ-large.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;While HCI has gone through several generations of computational technologies, it has carried a number of research themes forward. As mentioned, this chapter will consider the various HCI themes and their research findings that may be important when designing, constructing, or evaluating privacy mechanisms. Before exploring these HCI research streams, however, we first need a working definition of privacy, and to compare and contrast privacy concerns with HCI concerns.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Starr, Brian</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hindus, Debby</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scott D. Mainwaring</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hanging on the &#039;Wire: A Field Study of an Audio-only Media Space</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">audio</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">audio spaces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CMC</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">computer-mediated communication</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">electronic social spaces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">media spaces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">mediated communication</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">norms</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">privacy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">rich interactions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social interactions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social presence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">speech interactions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">telepresence</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1997</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complete</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">4</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">39–66</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The primary focus of this article is an analysis of an audio-only media space from a computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW) perspective. To explore whether audio by itself is suitable for shared media systems, we studied a workgroup using an audio-only media space. This media space, called Thunderwire, combined high-quality audio with open connec-tions to create a shared space for its users. The two-month field study provided a richly nuanced understanding of this audio spaces social use. The system afforded rich sociable interactions. As well, users were able to create a useful, usable social space; however, through an analysis of the social norms that the participants formulated, we show that they had to take into account being in an audio-only environment. Within the field study, then, audio by itself was sufficient for a usable media space and a useful social space, but users were forced to adapt to many audio-only and system conditions. The article also considers audios implications for privacy.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract><issue><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1</style></issue></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hindus, Debby</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scott D. Mainwaring</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Starr, Brian</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Thunderwire: A Field Study of an Audio-only Media Space</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Proceedings of the 1996 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW&#039;96)</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">audio</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">audio spaces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">CMC</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">computer-mediated communication</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">electronic social spaces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">media spaces</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">mediated communication</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">norms</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">rich interactions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social interactions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social presence</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">speech interactions</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">telepresence</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1996</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complete</style></url></web-urls></urls><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">238–247</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;To explore the potential of using audio by itself in a shared media system, we studied a workgroup using an audio-only media space. This media space, called Thunderwire, combined high-quality audio with open connections to create a shared space for its users. The two-month field study provided a richly nuanced understanding of this audio space&#039;s social use. The system afforded rich sociable interactions. Indeed, within the field study, audio by itself afforded a telepresent environment for its users. However while a usable media space and a useful social space, Thunderwire required its users to adapt to many audio-only conditions.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record></records></xml>