<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><xml><records><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Büyüktür, Ayşe G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hung, Pei-Yao</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Meade, Michelle</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark W. Newman</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Sociotechnical Design for the Care of People with Spinal Cord Injuries</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Designing Healthcare That Works:  A Socio-technical Approach</style></secondary-title></titles><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1-18</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Büyüktür, Ayşe G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hung, Pei-Yao</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark W. Newman</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Supporting Collaboratively Constructed Independence: A Study of Spinal Cord Injury</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW’18)</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">healthcare; articulation work; information work; chronic illness; collaboration; patient help; patient information; caregiving; temporality; temporal misalignment; information overload; health informatics; medical informatics.</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2018</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Patients are often overwhelmed in their efforts to understand their illnesses and determine what actions to take. In this paper, we want to show why care is sometimes not co-managed well between clinicians and patients, and the necessary information is often not well coordinated. Through a 2.5-year field study of an adult bone marrow transplant (BMT) clinic, we show there are different experiences of temporal ordering, or temporalities, between clinicians and patients (and their caregivers). We also show that misalignments between these temporalities can seriously affect the articulation (coordination) and information work that must go on for people to co-manage their conditions with clinicians. As one example, information flows can be misaligned, as a result of differing temporalities, causing sometimes an overwhelming amount of information to be presented and sometimes a lack of properly contextualized information. We also argue that these misalignments in temporalities, important in medicine, are a general coordination problem. Author Keywords&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Büyüktür, Ayşe G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark W. Newman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hung, Pei-Yao</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Design Considerations for Semi-Automated Tracking: Self-Care Plans in Spinal Cord Injury</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Proceedings of Pervasive Health 2017</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">medical informatics; patient-centered care; health IT; self-care plans; self-monitoring; semi-automated tracking; quantified self; context-aware environments; disability; rehabilitation; requirements; user needs; healthcare; healthcare IT</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Self-care in Spinal Cord Injury (SCI) is highly complex and individualized. Patients struggle to adapt to life with SCI, especially when they go home after rehabilitation. We conducted a field study to understand how self-care plans work for patients in their lived experience and what requirements there might be for an augmentative system. We found that patients develop their own self-care plans over time, and that routinization plays a key role in SCI self-care. Importantly, self-care activities exist in different states of routinization that have implications for the technological support that should be provided. Our findings suggest that self-care can be supported by different types of semi-automated tracking that account for the different routinization of activities, the collaborative nature of care, and the life-long, dynamic nature of this condition. The findings from our study also extend recent guidelines for semi-automated tracking in health&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Büyüktür, Ayşe G.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ackerman, Mark S.</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Information Work in Bone Marrow Transplant: Reducing Misalignment of Perspectives</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">articulation work</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">bone marrow transplant</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">caregiving</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">chronic illness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">collaboration</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">health informatics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">information overload</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">information work</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">medical informatics.</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patient help</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patient information</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">temporal misalignment</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">temporality</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2017</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complete</style></url></web-urls></urls><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1740–1752</style></pages><isbn><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">978-1-4503-4335-0</style></isbn><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Patients are often overwhelmed in their efforts to understand their illnesses and determine what actions to take. In this paper, we want to show why care is sometimes not co-managed well between clinicians and patients, and the necessary information is often not well coordinated. Through a 2.5-year field study of an adult bone marrow transplant (BMT) clinic, we show there are different experiences of temporal ordering, or temporalities, between clinicians and patients (and their caregivers). We also show that misalignments between these temporalities can seriously affect the articulation (coordination) and information work that must go on for people to co-manage their conditions with clinicians. As one example, information flows can be misaligned, as a result of differing temporalities, causing sometimes an overwhelming amount of information to be presented and sometimes a lack of properly contextualized information. We also argue that these misalignments in temporalities, important in medicine, are a general coordination problem.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ayse G Büyüktür</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Issues and opportunities in transitions from speciality care: a field study of bone marrow transplant</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Behaviour &amp; Information Technology</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">chronic illness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">continuity of care</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">expertise sharing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">health informatics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">healthcare</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">medical informatics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">medical work</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patient information</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">speciality transition</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complete-OnlyDOI</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">34</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">566–584</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Transitional points in patient care, such as handoffs and hospital discharges, are known to have unique information challenges. Transitions following long-term care involve even more complex processes. In this study, we examine the informational and contextual issues for patients transitioning from the care of specialists who have come to know them through long-term partnerships to clinicians potentially less familiar with patients’ chronic care concerns. The context is bone marrow transplant (BMT); specifically allogeneic transplants, which involve risk for particular chronic complications and a long-term process that requires close monitoring of patients by BMT specialists for at least a year beyond the actual transplant procedure. Based on a 16-month field study, we examine patient experience and clinician viewpoints regarding the transition of patient responsibility from BMT clinicians to primary care or oncologists, and detail the important issues for patients and clinicians.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michael S. Bernstein</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Little, Greg</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Miller, Robert C.</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hartmann, Björn</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David R. Karger</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Crowell, David</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Panovich, Katrina</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Soylent: A Word Processor with a Crowd Inside</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Commun. ACM</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">crowdsourcing</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complete-OnlyDOI</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">58</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">85–94</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;This paper introduces architectural and interaction patterns for integrating crowdsourced human contributions directly into user interfaces. We focus on writing and editing, complex endeavors that span many levels of conceptual and pragmatic activity. Authoring tools offer help with pragmatics, but for higher-level help, writers commonly turn to other people. We thus present Soylent, a word processing interface that enables writers to call on Mechanical Turk workers to shorten, proofread, and otherwise edit parts of their documents on demand. To improve worker quality, we introduce the Find-Fix-Verify crowd programming pattern, which splits tasks into a series of generation and review stages. Evaluation studies demonstrate the feasibility of crowdsourced editing and investigate questions of reliability, cost, wait time, and work time for edits.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Elizabeth Kaziunas</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ayse G Büyüktür</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Jones, Jasmine</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Choi, Sung W</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">David A Hanauer</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Transition and Reflection in the Use of Health Information: The Case of Pediatric Bone Marrow Transplant Caregivers</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work &amp; Social Computing (CSCW&#039;15)</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">caregiver</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">caregiving</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">emotional work</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">health and wellness</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">health informatics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">health information</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">healthcare technology</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">interactional work</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">medication informatics</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patient information</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patients</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pediatric</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reflection</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">reflecton work</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social worlds</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">work</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2015</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">02/2015</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complete</style></url></web-urls></urls><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ACM</style></publisher><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">1763-1774</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;The impact of health information on caregivers is of increasing interest to HCI/CSCW in designing systems to support the social and emotional dimensions of managing health. Drawing on an interview study, as well as corroborating data including a multi-year ethnography, we detail the practices of caregivers (particularly parents) in a bone marrow transplant (BMT) center. We examine the interconnections between information and emotion work performed by caregivers through a liminal lens, highlighting the BMT experience as a time of transition and reflection in which caregivers must quickly adapt to the new social world of the hospital and learn to manage a wide range of patient needs. The transition from parent to &#039;caregiver&#039; is challenging, placing additional emotional burdens on the intensive information work for managing BMT. As a time of reflection, the BMT experience also provides an occasion for generative thinking and alternative approaches to health management. Our study findings call for health systems that reflect a design paradigm focused on &#039;transforming lives&#039; rather than &#039;transferring information.&#039;&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Michael S. Bernstein</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ed H. Chi</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Robert C. Miller</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The trouble with social computing systems research</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference on Human factors in computing systems, extended abstracts  (CHI EA ’11)</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">evaluation</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social computing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">systems research</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2011</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">5/2011</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complete-OnlyDOI</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Social computing has led to an explosion of research in understanding users, and it has the potential to similarly revolutionize systems research. However, the number of papers designing and building new sociotechnical systems has not kept pace. We analyze challenges facing social computing systems research, ranging from misaligned methodological incentives, evaluation expectations, double standards, and relevance compared to industry. We suggest improvements for the community to consider so that we can chart the future of our field.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Huh, Jina</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark W. Newman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Ayse G Büyüktür</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Progressive Scenarios: A Rapid Method for Understanding User Interpretations of Technology</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Proceedings of the 16th ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work (GROUP ’10)</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ambiguity</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">multiple interpretations</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pervasive</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">pervasive environments</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">scenario-based design</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">ubicomp</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">usercentered design</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2010</style></year><pub-dates><date><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">11/2010</style></date></pub-dates></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complete</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;For emerging group technologies that require evaluations on long-term use and social norms, assumptions, and implicit rules that develop around the technologies, standard usability testing may not be adequate. At the same time, field based research that allows for observing technology use over long-term is costly in terms of time. In this paper, we present a rapid method that we call progressive scenarios, which could help replicate the processes by which interpretations evolve over time in natural settings and how invisible assumptions and social norms dictate the technology use. Using a preliminary design concept of a publicly available ambient personal information and communication system, we demonstrate how the method helped to elicit design implications.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>47</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Lada A. Adamic</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zhang, Jun</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bakshy, Eytan</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Knowledge Sharing and Yahoo Answers: Everyone Knows Something</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on World Wide Web</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">expertise finding</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">expertise sharing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">help seeking</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">knowledge sharing</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">online communities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Q&amp;A communities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">QA communities</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">question answering</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">social network analysis</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complete</style></url></web-urls></urls><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Yahoo Answers (YA) is a large and diverse question-answer forum, acting not only as a medium for sharing technical knowledge, but as a place where one can seek advice, gather opinions, and satisfy one&#039;s curiosity about a countless number of things. In this paper, we seek to understand YA&#039;s knowledge sharing and activity. We analyze the forum categories and cluster them according to content characteristics and patterns of interaction among the users. While interactions in some categories resemble expertise sharing forums, others incorporate discussion, everyday advice, and support. With such a diversity of categories in which one can participate, we find that some users focus narrowly on specific topics, while others participate across categories. This not only allows us to map related categories, but to characterize the entropy of the users&#039; interests. We find that lower entropy correlates with receiving higher answer ratings, but only for categories where factual expertise is primarily sought after. We combine both user attributes and answer characteristics to predict, within a given category, whether a particular answer will be chosen as the best answer by the asker.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>5</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hofer, Erik C</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Hanisch, Robert J</style></author></authors><secondary-authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Olson, Gary M</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Zimmerman, Ann</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Bos, Nathan</style></author></secondary-authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">The national virtual observatory</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Scientific collaboration on the Internet</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">astronomy</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">big data</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">cyberinfrastructure</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><publisher><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">MIT Press</style></publisher><pub-location><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Cambridge, MA</style></pub-location><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Like many scientific communities, the astronomy community faces a coming avalanche of data as instrumentation improves in quality as well as in its ability to integrate with computational and data resources. Unlike scientific fields that are oriented around a small number of major instruments, such as high-energy physics, astronomers use a large number of telescopes located around the world that are designed and calibrated to look at celestial objects in fundamentally different ways. Both space and terrestrial telescopes are designed to observe objects across a narrow part of the energy spectrum, typically focusing on a small part of the spectrum from the infrared to X-ray wavelengths. While each telescope has the potential to reveal and characterize new astronomical objects, even more powerful would be the ability to combine the data produced by each of these instruments to create a unified picture of the observable universe. This data fusion requires federating a large number of data sets, and developing the search and analysis routines that allow investigation across multiple wavelengths.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The National Virtual Observatory (NVO) project is funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF) to provide the cyberinfrastructure necessary to support the federation of a large number of astronomical data sets, allowing search across multiple data sets and the development of simulations that incorporate many types of astronomical data. Through the development of tools and standardized data models, the NVO hopes to enable the combination of multiple pointed-observation telescopes and sky surveys into a large, unified data set that effectively functions as a broadband, worldwide telescope. The NVO is part of a larger effort, known as the International Virtual Observatory Alliance (IVOA), to support data federation and exchange across a number of national and regional virtual observatories.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record><record><source-app name="Biblio" version="7.x">Drupal-Biblio</source-app><ref-type>17</ref-type><contributors><authors><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barbara Mirel</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Barton, Ellen</style></author><author><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Mark S. Ackerman</style></author></authors></contributors><titles><title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Researching telemedicine: Capturing complex clinical interactions with a simple interface design</style></title><secondary-title><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Technical communication quarterly</style></secondary-title></titles><keywords><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">depression monitoring</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">patient-clinician communication</style></keyword><keyword><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">telemedicine</style></keyword></keywords><dates><year><style  face="normal" font="default" size="100%">2008</style></year></dates><urls><web-urls><url><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">Complete</style></url></web-urls></urls><volume><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">17</style></volume><pages><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">358–378</style></pages><language><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">eng</style></language><abstract><style face="normal" font="default" size="100%">&lt;p&gt;Telemedicine has been shown to be an effective means of managing follow-up care in chronic diseases such as depression. Exactly why telemedicine calls work, however, remains largely unknown because there are no adequate research tools to describe the complex communicative interactions in these encounters. We report here an ongoing project to investigate the efficacy of telemedicine in depression care, arguing that technical communication specialists have unique contributions to make to this kind of research.&lt;/p&gt;</style></abstract></record></records></xml>